2026 Merida eONE-SIXTY vs 2026 Rocky Mountain Altitude Powerplay Alloy

What changes on the Rocky Mountain Altitude Powerplay Alloy

Compared with the Merida eONE-SIXTY in MID, the Rocky Mountain Altitude Powerplay Alloy in M places the top of the head tube 5 mm lower and 9 mm further back, relative to the bottom bracket. Its wheelbase is 7 mm shorter, which can contribute to quicker direction changes.

Frame stack

−5 mm

Lower front end

Frame reach

−9 mm

Shorter frame reach

Wheelbase

−7 mm

Shorter: quicker to change direction

Head angle

−0.9°

Slacker: calmer steering

Chainstays

n/a

One of the bikes has no number for this

The two frames

We can't draw these frames yet. The Merida eONE-SIXTY numbers we have for size MID are missing the seat angle. The numbers below still compare.

Geometry side by side

Differences are the Rocky Mountain Altitude Powerplay Alloy minus the Merida eONE-SIXTY. Full charts: 2026 Merida eONE-SIXTY, 2026 Rocky Mountain Altitude Powerplay Alloy.

Where each sits in its class

Merida eONE-SIXTYRocky Mountain Altitude Powerplay Alloy

Each bike is ranked against the other enduro bikes on Quiver, on frame geometry alone. Not your hand position or ride feel.

What each ships with

The stock build of each bike's first listed trim. Parts that match are dimmed.