2025 Rivendell Atlantis vs 2027 Trek 920 Frameset
We can't match sizes for these two: one of them has no stack and reach for the sizes shown.
What changes on the Trek 920 Frameset
- Frame stack
- n/a
- One of the bikes has no number for this
- Frame reach
- n/a
- One of the bikes has no number for this
- Wheelbase
- n/a
- One of the bikes has no number for this
- Head angle
- −1.0°
- Slacker: calmer steering
- Chainstays
- n/a
- One of the bikes has no number for this
The two frames
We can't draw these frames yet. The Rivendell Atlantis numbers we have for size 54.5 are missing the reach, stack, chainstay length and wheelbase. The numbers below still compare.
Geometry side by side
| Measurement | Rivendell Atlantis 54.5 | Trek 920 Frameset 54 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reach | not listed | 392 | |
| Stack | not listed | 583 | |
| Head tube angle | 72 | 71.0° | −1.0° |
| Seat tube angle | 72 | not listed | |
| Effective top tube | not listed | 562 | |
| BB drop | 48 | 85 | +37 mm |
| Standover | not listed | 760 | |
| Seat tube length | not listed | 490 | |
| Chainstay length | not listed | 465 | |
| Wheelbase | not listed | 1079 | |
| BB height | not listed | 283 | |
| Head tube length | not listed | 120 |
Differences are the Trek 920 Frameset minus the Rivendell Atlantis. Full charts: 2025 Rivendell Atlantis, 2027 Trek 920 Frameset.
Where each sits in its class
Rivendell AtlantisTrek 920 Frameset
AggressivePositionUpright
CalmSteeringQuick
PlayfulBalancePlanted
Each bike is ranked against the other gravel bikes on Quiver, on frame geometry alone. Not your hand position or ride feel.
What each ships with
The stock build of each bike's first listed trim. Parts that match are dimmed.
| Part | Rivendell AtlantisAtlantis | Trek 920 Frameset |
|---|---|---|
| Frame | Rivendell Atlantis | not listed |
| Fork | threaded | not listed |
Know what is on every bike.
Add your bike to Quiver. Keep its parts, setup, and service history together, then share your build.
Explore the app
