2025 Salsa Beargrease C vs 2027 Trek Farley
The Trek Farley size closest to your M is the M. Compare the M instead
What changes on the Trek Farley
Compared with the Salsa Beargrease C in M, the Trek Farley in S places the top of the head tube 18 mm lower and 26 mm further back, relative to the bottom bracket. Its wheelbase is 32 mm shorter, which can contribute to quicker direction changes.
- Frame stack
- −18 mm
- Lower front end
- Frame reach
- −27 mm
- Shorter frame reach
- Wheelbase
- −32 mm
- Shorter: quicker to change direction
- Head angle
- −0.1°
- About the same head angle
- Chainstays
- +10 mm
- Longer: more planted
The two frames
Salsa Beargrease C, MTrek Farley, SDrawn to scale and lined up at the bottom bracket.
Geometry side by side
| Measurement | Salsa Beargrease C M | Trek Farley S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reach | 426.5 | 400 | −27 mm |
| Stack | 606.7 | 589 | −18 mm |
| Head tube angle | 68.56 | 68.5° | −0.1° |
| Seat tube angle | 73.0 | 74.0° | +1.0° |
| Effective top tube | 612.0 | 565 | −47 mm |
| Chainstay length | 440.0 | 450 | +10 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1129.2 | 1097 | −32 mm |
| BB drop | 65.0 | 65 | ±0 mm |
| Standover | 744.4 | 730 | −14 mm |
| Seat tube length | 444.0 | 380 | −64 mm |
| Fork length | 483.0 | not listed | |
| Head tube length | 118.0 | 90 | −28 mm |
| BB height | not listed | 320 |
Differences are the Trek Farley minus the Salsa Beargrease C. Full charts: 2025 Salsa Beargrease C, 2027 Trek Farley.
Where each sits in its class
Salsa Beargrease CTrek Farley
Each bike is ranked against the other fat bikes on Quiver, on frame geometry alone. Not your hand position or ride feel.
Know what is on every bike.
Add your bike to Quiver. Keep its parts, setup, and service history together, then share your build.
Explore the app
