2019 Salsa Timberjack vs 2017 Ibis Ripley LS
We can't match sizes for these two: one of them has no stack and reach for the sizes shown.
What changes on the Ibis Ripley LS
- Frame stack
- n/a
- One of the bikes has no number for this
- Frame reach
- n/a
- One of the bikes has no number for this
- Wheelbase
- n/a
- One of the bikes has no number for this
- Head angle
- −0.1°
- About the same head angle
- Chainstays
- n/a
- One of the bikes has no number for this
The two frames
We can't draw these frames yet. The Salsa Timberjack numbers we have for size M are missing the chainstay length and wheelbase. The numbers below still compare.
Geometry side by side
| Measurement | Salsa Timberjack M | Ibis Ripley LS L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reach | 426 | not listed | |
| Stack | 611 | not listed | |
| Head tube angle | 67.6 | 67.5 | −0.1° |
| Seat tube angle | 73.2 | 73 | −0.2° |
| Effective top tube | 611 | 619 | +8 mm |
| BB drop | 57 | not listed | |
| Standover | 760 | not listed | |
| Seat tube length | 431.8 | 470 | +38 mm |
| Fork length | 509 | not listed | |
| Head tube length | 110 | not listed |
Differences are the Ibis Ripley LS minus the Salsa Timberjack. Full charts: 2019 Salsa Timberjack, 2017 Ibis Ripley LS.
Where each sits in its class
Salsa TimberjackIbis Ripley LS
AggressivePositionUpright
CalmSteeringQuick
Each bike is ranked against the other trail bikes on Quiver, on frame geometry alone. Not your hand position or ride feel.
Know what is on every bike.
Add your bike to Quiver. Keep its parts, setup, and service history together, then share your build.
Explore the app
