2014 Santa Cruz 5010 vs 2016 Ibis Ripley LS
The Ibis Ripley LS size closest to your M is the M. Compare the M instead
What changes on the Ibis Ripley LS
Compared with the Santa Cruz 5010 in M, the Ibis Ripley LS in XL places the top of the head tube 44 mm higher and 44 mm further forward, relative to the bottom bracket. Its wheelbase is 89 mm longer, which can contribute to stability at speed.
- Frame stack
- +44 mm
- Higher front end
- Frame reach
- +44 mm
- Longer frame reach
- Wheelbase
- +89 mm
- Longer: steadier at speed
- Head angle
- −0.5°
- Slacker: calmer steering
- Chainstays
- n/a
- One of the bikes has no number for this
The two frames
We can't draw these frames yet. The Santa Cruz 5010 numbers we have for size M are missing the chainstay length. The numbers below still compare.
Geometry side by side
| Measurement | Santa Cruz 5010 M | Ibis Ripley LS XL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reach | 404 | 448 | +44 mm |
| Stack | 590.7 | 635 | +44 mm |
| Head tube angle | 68 | 67.5 | −0.5° |
| Seat tube angle | 73 | 73 | ±0.0° |
| Wheelbase | 1098 | 1187 | +89 mm |
| Standover | 729 | not listed | |
| Effective top tube | not listed | 640 | |
| Seat tube length | not listed | 521 |
Differences are the Ibis Ripley LS minus the Santa Cruz 5010. Full charts: 2014 Santa Cruz 5010, 2016 Ibis Ripley LS.
Where each sits in its class
Santa Cruz 5010Ibis Ripley LS
Each bike is ranked against the other trail bikes on Quiver, on frame geometry alone. Not your hand position or ride feel.
Know what is on every bike.
Add your bike to Quiver. Keep its parts, setup, and service history together, then share your build.
Explore the app
