Quiver

2012 Specialized Crux E5 OSBB vs 2011 Salsa Chili Con Crosso

The Salsa Chili Con Crosso size closest to your 54 is the 55. Compare the 55 instead

What changes on the Salsa Chili Con Crosso

Compared with the Specialized Crux E5 OSBB in 54, the Salsa Chili Con Crosso in 53 places the top of the head tube 17 mm lower and 7 mm further back, relative to the bottom bracket.

Frame stack
−17 mm
Lower front end
Frame reach
−7 mm
Shorter frame reach
Wheelbase
n/a
One of the bikes has no number for this
Head angle
−0.5°
Slacker: calmer steering
Chainstays
±0 mm
About the same

The two frames

2012 Specialized Crux E5 OSBB (54)The Specialized Crux E5 OSBB frame drawn to scale.J 1016

Only the Specialized Crux E5 OSBB is drawn. The Salsa Chili Con Crosso numbers we have for size 53 are missing the wheelbase.

Geometry side by side

MeasurementSpecialized Crux E5 OSBB 54Salsa Chili Con Crosso 53Difference
Reach379mm372−7 mm
Stack567mm550.2−17 mm
Head tube angle71.5°71−0.5°
Seat tube angle73.5°73.5±0.0°
Chainstay length425mm425±0 mm
Wheelbase1016mmnot listed
Standover809mm796.2−13 mm
Seat tube length540mm535−5 mm
Head tube length140mm130−10 mm
Effective top tubenot listed535
BB dropnot listed68
Fork lengthnot listed395

Differences are the Salsa Chili Con Crosso minus the Specialized Crux E5 OSBB. Full charts: 2012 Specialized Crux E5 OSBB, 2011 Salsa Chili Con Crosso.

Where each sits in its class

Specialized Crux E5 OSBBSalsa Chili Con Crosso

AggressivePositionUpright
CalmSteeringQuick
PlayfulBalancePlanted

Each bike is ranked against the other gravel bikes on Quiver, on frame geometry alone. Not your hand position or ride feel.

Know what is on every bike.

Add your bike to Quiver. Keep its parts, setup, and service history together, then share your build.

Explore the app
A Transition Relay build sheet: frame, fork, shock and drivetrainThe Relay’s ride photo galleryThe Relay’s ride spectrum and 2D frame geometryThe garage: five bikes and 99 recorded partsA Specialized Tarmac SL8 road build sheet