Quiver

2012 Specialized Crux E5 OSBB vs 2011 Salsa Chili Con Crosso

The Salsa Chili Con Crosso size closest to your 54 is the 55. Compare the 55 instead

What changes on the Salsa Chili Con Crosso

Compared with the Specialized Crux E5 OSBB in 54, the Salsa Chili Con Crosso in 56 places the top of the head tube 20 mm higher and about as far forward, relative to the bottom bracket.

Frame stack
+20 mm
Higher front end
Frame reach
+1 mm
About the same reach
Wheelbase
n/a
One of the bikes has no number for this
Head angle
±0.0°
About the same head angle
Chainstays
±0 mm
About the same

The two frames

2012 Specialized Crux E5 OSBB (54)The Specialized Crux E5 OSBB frame drawn to scale.J 1016

Only the Specialized Crux E5 OSBB is drawn. The Salsa Chili Con Crosso numbers we have for size 56 are missing the wheelbase.

Geometry side by side

MeasurementSpecialized Crux E5 OSBB 54Salsa Chili Con Crosso 56Difference
Reach379mm379.9+1 mm
Stack567mm586.9+20 mm
Head tube angle71.5°71.5±0.0°
Seat tube angle73.5°72.5−1.0°
Chainstay length425mm425±0 mm
Wheelbase1016mmnot listed
Standover809mm839.7+31 mm
Seat tube length540mm580+40 mm
Head tube length140mm170+30 mm
Effective top tubenot listed565
BB dropnot listed65
Fork lengthnot listed395

Differences are the Salsa Chili Con Crosso minus the Specialized Crux E5 OSBB. Full charts: 2012 Specialized Crux E5 OSBB, 2011 Salsa Chili Con Crosso.

Where each sits in its class

Specialized Crux E5 OSBBSalsa Chili Con Crosso

AggressivePositionUpright
CalmSteeringQuick
PlayfulBalancePlanted

Each bike is ranked against the other gravel bikes on Quiver, on frame geometry alone. Not your hand position or ride feel.

Know what is on every bike.

Add your bike to Quiver. Keep its parts, setup, and service history together, then share your build.

Explore the app
A Transition Relay build sheet: frame, fork, shock and drivetrainThe Relay’s ride photo galleryThe Relay’s ride spectrum and 2D frame geometryThe garage: five bikes and 99 recorded partsA Specialized Tarmac SL8 road build sheet