2010 Specialized Roubaix SL2 Module vs 2010 Specialized Tarmac SL3 Module
We can't match sizes for these two: one of them has no stack and reach for the sizes shown.
What changes on the Specialized Tarmac SL3 Module
- Frame stack
- n/a
- One of the bikes has no number for this
- Frame reach
- n/a
- One of the bikes has no number for this
- Wheelbase
- −22 mm
- Shorter: quicker to change direction
- Head angle
- +1.0°
- Steeper: sharper steering
- Chainstays
- −10 mm
- Shorter: livelier
The two frames
We can't draw these frames yet. The Specialized Roubaix SL2 Module numbers we have for size 54 are missing the reach and stack. The numbers below still compare.
Geometry side by side
| Measurement | Specialized Roubaix SL2 Module 54 | Specialized Tarmac SL3 Module 54 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Head tube angle | 72° | 73° | +1.0° |
| Seat tube angle | 73.5° | 73.5° | ±0.0° |
| Effective top tube | 548mm | 548mm | ±0 mm |
| Chainstay length | 415mm | 405mm | −10 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1000mm | 978mm | −22 mm |
| BB drop | 71.5mm | 69mm | −3 mm |
| Standover | 780mm | 768mm | −12 mm |
| Seat tube length | 495mm | 510mm | +15 mm |
| Head tube length | 165mm | 130mm | −35 mm |
Differences are the Specialized Tarmac SL3 Module minus the Specialized Roubaix SL2 Module. Full charts: 2010 Specialized Roubaix SL2 Module, 2010 Specialized Tarmac SL3 Module.
Where each sits in its class
Specialized Roubaix SL2 ModuleSpecialized Tarmac SL3 Module
Each bike is ranked against the other road bikes on Quiver, on frame geometry alone. Not your hand position or ride feel.
What each ships with
The stock build of each bike's first listed trim. Parts that match are dimmed.
| Part | Specialized Roubaix SL2 ModuleS-Works SL2 Module | Specialized Tarmac SL3 ModuleS-Works Module |
|---|---|---|
| Frame | Specialized S-Works Roubaix FACT | Specialized S-Works Tarmac SL3 FACT |
Know what is on every bike.
Add your bike to Quiver. Keep its parts, setup, and service history together, then share your build.
Explore the app
