2027 Trek 920 Frameset vs 2025 Rivendell Atlantis
The Rivendell Atlantis size closest to your 54 is the 53. Compare the 53 instead
What changes on the Rivendell Atlantis
Compared with the Trek 920 Frameset in 54, the Rivendell Atlantis in 50 places the top of the head tube 17 mm lower and 3 mm further back, relative to the bottom bracket.
- Frame stack
- −17 mm
- Lower front end
- Frame reach
- −3 mm
- Shorter frame reach
- Wheelbase
- n/a
- One of the bikes has no number for this
- Head angle
- −1.0°
- Slacker: calmer steering
- Chainstays
- n/a
- One of the bikes has no number for this
The two frames
We can't draw these frames yet. The Trek 920 Frameset numbers we have for size 54 are missing the seat angle. The numbers below still compare.
Geometry side by side
| Measurement | Trek 920 Frameset 54 | Rivendell Atlantis 50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reach | 392 | 389 | −3 mm |
| Stack | 583 | 566 | −17 mm |
| Head tube angle | 71.0° | 70 | −1.0° |
| Effective top tube | 562 | not listed | |
| Chainstay length | 465 | not listed | |
| Wheelbase | 1079 | not listed | |
| BB drop | 85 | not listed | |
| BB height | 283 | not listed | |
| Standover | 760 | not listed | |
| Seat tube length | 490 | 500 | +10 mm |
| Head tube length | 120 | not listed | |
| Seat tube angle | not listed | 72 |
Differences are the Rivendell Atlantis minus the Trek 920 Frameset. Full charts: 2027 Trek 920 Frameset, 2025 Rivendell Atlantis.
Where each sits in its class
Trek 920 FramesetRivendell Atlantis
Each bike is ranked against the other gravel bikes on Quiver, on frame geometry alone. Not your hand position or ride feel.
What each ships with
The stock build of each bike's first listed trim. Parts that match are dimmed.
| Part | Trek 920 Frameset | Rivendell AtlantisAtlantis |
|---|---|---|
| Frame | not listed | Rivendell Atlantis |
| Fork | not listed | threaded |
Know what is on every bike.
Add your bike to Quiver. Keep its parts, setup, and service history together, then share your build.
Explore the app
