2019 Trek Émonda ALR vs 2021 Specialized Tarmac SL7 Pro
We can't match sizes for these two: one of them has no stack and reach for the sizes shown.
What changes on the Specialized Tarmac SL7 Pro
- Frame stack
- n/a
- One of the bikes has no number for this
- Frame reach
- n/a
- One of the bikes has no number for this
- Wheelbase
- −6 mm
- Shorter: quicker to change direction
- Head angle
- ±0.0°
- About the same head angle
- Chainstays
- ±0 mm
- About the same
The two frames
We can't draw these frames yet. The Trek Émonda ALR numbers we have for size 54 are missing the seat angle. The numbers below still compare.
Geometry side by side
| Measurement | Trek Émonda ALR 54 | Specialized Tarmac SL7 Pro 54 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reach | 381 | not listed | |
| Stack | 555 | not listed | |
| Head tube angle | 73.0° | 73 | ±0.0° |
| Effective top tube | 543 | not listed | |
| Chainstay length | 410 | 410 | ±0 mm |
| Wheelbase | 981 | 975 | −6 mm |
| BB drop | 70 | 72 | +2 mm |
| Standover | 742 | 768mm | +26 mm |
| Seat tube length | 506 | not listed | |
| Head tube length | 155 | not listed | |
| Seat tube angle | not listed | 74 | |
| BB height | not listed | 268 |
Differences are the Specialized Tarmac SL7 Pro minus the Trek Émonda ALR. Full charts: 2019 Trek Émonda ALR, 2021 Specialized Tarmac SL7 Pro.
Where each sits in its class
Trek Émonda ALRSpecialized Tarmac SL7 Pro
AggressivePositionUpright
CalmSteeringQuick
PlayfulBalancePlanted
Each bike is ranked against the other road bikes on Quiver, on frame geometry alone. Not your hand position or ride feel.
Know what is on every bike.
Add your bike to Quiver. Keep its parts, setup, and service history together, then share your build.
Explore the app
