2022 Trek Émonda ALR Disc Frameset vs 2021 Specialized Tarmac SL7 Pro
We can't match sizes for these two: one of them has no stack and reach for the sizes shown.
What changes on the Specialized Tarmac SL7 Pro
- Frame stack
- n/a
- One of the bikes has no number for this
- Frame reach
- n/a
- One of the bikes has no number for this
- Wheelbase
- −8 mm
- Shorter: quicker to change direction
- Head angle
- −0.5°
- Slacker: calmer steering
- Chainstays
- ±0 mm
- About the same
The two frames
We can't draw these frames yet. The Trek Émonda ALR Disc Frameset numbers we have for size 56 are missing the seat angle. The numbers below still compare.
Geometry side by side
| Measurement | Trek Émonda ALR Disc Frameset 56 | Specialized Tarmac SL7 Pro 54 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reach | 387 | not listed | |
| Stack | 577 | not listed | |
| Head tube angle | 73.5° | 73 | −0.5° |
| Effective top tube | 560 | not listed | |
| Chainstay length | 410 | 410 | ±0 mm |
| Wheelbase | 983 | 975 | −8 mm |
| BB drop | 70 | 72 | +2 mm |
| Standover | 767 | 768mm | +1 mm |
| Seat tube length | 533 | not listed | |
| Head tube length | 170 | not listed | |
| Seat tube angle | not listed | 74 | |
| BB height | not listed | 268 |
Differences are the Specialized Tarmac SL7 Pro minus the Trek Émonda ALR Disc Frameset. Full charts: 2022 Trek Émonda ALR Disc Frameset, 2021 Specialized Tarmac SL7 Pro.
Where each sits in its class
Trek Émonda ALR Disc FramesetSpecialized Tarmac SL7 Pro
Each bike is ranked against the other road bikes on Quiver, on frame geometry alone. Not your hand position or ride feel.
What each ships with
The stock build of each bike's first listed trim. Parts that match are dimmed.
| Part | Trek Émonda ALR Disc FramesetALR Disc Frameset | Specialized Tarmac SL7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Frame | Trek Ultralight 300 | not listed |
| Fork | Trek Émonda SL | not listed |
Know what is on every bike.
Add your bike to Quiver. Keep its parts, setup, and service history together, then share your build.
Explore the app
