2027 Canyon Aeroad CF vs 2027 Canyon Ultimate CF
The Canyon Ultimate CF size closest to your M is the M. Compare the M instead
What changes on the Canyon Ultimate CF
Compared with the Canyon Aeroad CF in M, the Canyon Ultimate CF in S places the top of the head tube 21 mm lower and 3 mm further back, relative to the bottom bracket. Its wheelbase is 6 mm shorter, which can contribute to quicker direction changes.
- Frame stack
- −21 mm
- Lower front end
- Frame reach
- −3 mm
- Shorter frame reach
- Wheelbase
- −6 mm
- Shorter: quicker to change direction
- Head angle
- −0.5°
- Slacker: calmer steering
- Chainstays
- ±0 mm
- About the same
The two frames
Canyon Aeroad CF, MCanyon Ultimate CF, SDrawn to scale and lined up at the bottom bracket.
Geometry side by side
| Measurement | Canyon Aeroad CF M | Canyon Ultimate CF S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reach | 393 | 390 | −3 mm |
| Stack | 560 | 539 | −21 mm |
| Head tube angle | 73.25 | 72.8 | −0.5° |
| Seat tube angle | 73.5 | 73.5 | ±0.0° |
| Effective top tube | 559 | 546 | −13 mm |
| Chainstay length | 410 | 410 | ±0 mm |
| Wheelbase | 988 | 982 | −6 mm |
| BB drop | 70 | 73 | +3 mm |
| Standover | 801 | 775 | −26 mm |
| Seat tube length | 531 | 480 | −51 mm |
| Head tube length | 142 | 121 | −21 mm |
Differences are the Canyon Ultimate CF minus the Canyon Aeroad CF. Full charts: 2027 Canyon Aeroad CF, 2027 Canyon Ultimate CF.
Where each sits in its class
Canyon Aeroad CFCanyon Ultimate CF
Each bike is ranked against the other road bikes on Quiver, on frame geometry alone. Not your hand position or ride feel.
Know what is on every bike.
Add your bike to Quiver. Keep its parts, setup, and service history together, then share your build.
Explore the app
